Athletes have replays.
Pilots have recorders.
Engineers have logs.
Doctors… what do doctors have?
Now doctors have
Review today. Save lives tomorrow.
The Problem
Nobody sees the mistakes.
Not even the student making them.
- 2,000+ new medical students every year1
- ~20 hospitals where clinical training happens2
- 400 students training in one hospital at once3
- A few rushed minutes of feedback per student, on a lucky day
Consultants rightly put patients first. A ward round is not a classroom, so guidance is scarce, for good reasons.
Students see patient after patient, and the details blur. A step skipped on Tuesday is skipped again on Friday, because nobody saw it happen, including the student.
How might we improve the training process of a Sri Lankan medical undergraduate?
Problem Statement
- 1 2,049 entered state medical schools in 2024; UGC intake for 2022/23 was 2,085.
- 2 Counted as hospitals where clinical training takes place, which is broader than the officially designated “Teaching Hospital” list.
- 3 Roughly 100 students per hospital per batch, with four batches training at the same time.
The Solution
Give the student the replay.
Phase one Available in the concept as designed
-
01
Record.
Smart glasses capture the patient interaction exactly as the student sees it, with the patient’s consent, every time.
-
02
Review.
Timestamped, searchable footage. Rewatch the examination, spot what you missed, time yourself.
-
03
Share.
Share a recording with the batch, and one student’s patient becomes two hundred students’ lesson.
Phase two The AI layer: where we are heading next
Real-time nudges
-
Audio. Miss a step and a gentle sound says something’s off, the way a supervisor clears their throat. It doesn’t say what. The student thinks first.
-
Visual. Still unsure? A glance to the side shows the exact missed step.
Daily feedback
Each evening MedFlix highlights the moments that went wrong, shows progress, and says what to work on tomorrow.
A guide beside you during the examination.
A mentor reviewing your footage after.
The Product
What it actually looks like.
The idea, in 20 seconds
The whole loop in one take the nudge in the moment, then the replay after.
The mobile app
Review recorded interactions wherever you are, revisit feedback, and keep track of what to improve before the next patient.
The dashboard
Every interaction you have recorded, and every one your batch has shared, laid out as rows you can scan in seconds. Duration, feedback score and checklist completion, tracked over the month, not guessed at.
Through the glasses
First the sound: something’s off. If the student is still unsure, a glance aside shows the exact step, and their eyes go back to the patient.
Two devices, one student
A first-year needs a supervisor’s voice in the moment; a final-year only needs the review at the end of the day. So the hardware follows the student.
Camera plus an in-lens display. The audio alert and the glance-up cue in the moment, the review at night.
Camera and open-ear audio, no display. By now the daily feedback is all they need.
Assisting goes down as experience goes up. That was on the flipchart before it was on a roadmap.
Who it’s for
Sri Lankan medical undergraduates.
Starting with early adopters at the University of Moratuwa, whose young medical faculty has the fewest built-up resources, and the most to gain.
How it rolls out
Trials first. Then the council.
- 1 Trials with selected hospitals and universities.
- 2 The Sri Lanka Medical Council, so MedFlix becomes part and parcel of medical training.
Licensed to institutions, kept affordable for students.
Data protection
Consent first.
Recording a patient is a serious act. MedFlix is being designed around Sri Lanka’s Personal Data Protection Act, and around one rule before any other:
-
Consent
Nothing will be recorded without the patient’s explicit consent for a stated purpose. Where the patient is a minor, a guardian’s.
-
SL PDPA
Health data is a special category under the Act. Its requirements on security, retention and patients’ rights will shape how MedFlix is built.
How we got here
Our Journey
The half above is the product. This half is the rooms, flipcharts and arguments that got us there. Everything below happened.
-
01
We listened.
We interviewed around ten medical students across three universities: Moratuwa, Colombo and Sri Jayawardenapura. We expected to hear about equipment. We heard about being alone.
~10students interviewed3universities“If I can review my own work, that is a game changer.”
-
02
We framed it.
Medical education runs lecture, then training, then evaluation. Only the middle is unsupervised. Training, where students are most alone, is where we aimed.
Problem Statement V2
LectureTrainingEvaluationAssisting + Evaluating
- Guide the student during training with feedback.
- Record & review the patient interaction, and share it among students, with patient consent.
- Indicate time elapsed per examination.
- Timestamp necessary events for further analysis.
- Assisting ↓ as experience ↑.
The original, in the room -
03
We mapped the student.
A Value Proposition Canvas, built from the interviews. The left side holds only what the student’s pains demanded, nothing we simply wanted to build.
The original, in the room Value Proposition Canvas
What we build
Features
- Recording patient interactions
- Show timer
- Supervisor-like pointers
Gain creators
- Effective self-learning
- Recorded interactions shared among students
- Goal-based, timely reports
Pain solvers
- Record the interaction and review it later
- Can show time without the patient knowing
- Pointers reduce unintentional overlooks
Who we build for
Gains
- Review patient interactions
- Share interactions with other students
- Feedback on my work and progress
Jobs
- Take patient history
- Examinations
- Study human anatomy
Pains
- Less guidance
- Forgetting patient interactions
- Can’t time without patient knowledge
- Unintentional overlooks
-
04
We stress-tested the idea.
A Lean Canvas, to find where the idea broke. It mostly held. The existing alternative, reviewing notes with doctors, fails only because doctors have no time.
The original, in the room Lean Canvas
2 Problem
- Less guidance during training, and unintentional overlooks
- Forgetting patient interactions
- Can’t time without the patient knowing
Existing alternatives. Doctors in teaching hospitals are time-constrained, so students review their notes with doctors when they can.
4 Solution
- Nudge users like a supervisor in real time, and provide daily feedback
- Record patient interactions for later review
- Show elapsed time using audio or visual cues
3 Unique value proposition
Review the first-person perspective of patient interactions, built for medical students.
9 Unfair advantage
A complementary team with first-hand exposure to the target audience.
1 Customer segments
- Sri Lanka Medical Council
- Sri Lankan medical undergraduates
Early adopters. University of Moratuwa medical students. The faculty started recently, so there are fewer built-up resources.
8 Key metrics
- Key action: recording patient interactions
- Success metric: university adaptability
5 Channels
- SLMC
- Medical Student Union
- Word of mouth
7 Cost structure
- Wearable
- Hosting (analyser)
- Storage
- LLM usage
6 Revenue streams
- Subscription for students
- Licensing fee for SLMC and universities
The original canvas also carried the day’s working figures, 2,095 students and 22 hospitals. The headline numbers above use the more conservative wording.
-
05
We chose the hardware.
Glasses, because the camera has to see what the student sees. But one flipchart line kept coming back: assisting goes down as experience goes up. So one device cannot be right for all five years.
Early years Meta Ray-Ban DisplayGlasses with an in-lens display. The student is still learning the steps, so they get prompted while it matters, and reviewed afterwards.
Later years AIseeNo glasses. The student no longer needs prompting mid-examination, so the device drops back to capture and the daily feedback they still use.
The product does not lose features. The student outgrows them. Recorded on the flipchart as “Meta Ray-Ban Display → AIsee V2”.
-
06
We said it out loud.
The pitch, as delivered on stage. One camera in the room, one take.
Talk to us
Want to bring MedFlix to your hospital or faculty?
Curious about the project, the research behind it, or where it goes next? We’d love to talk.
saai@designthinking.lk